Aplicación orbitaria de productos de relleno para optimización de simetría en pacientes con microftalmia o cavidades anoftálmicas adquiridas: revisión de la literatura / Aplicación orbitaria de productos de relleno para optimización de simetría en pacientes con microftalmia o cavidades anoftálmicas adquiridas: revisión de la literatura Orbital administration of fillers for optimization of symmetry in patients with microphthalmos or acquired anophthalmic sockets: A review

El tratamiento de la asimetría facial en pacientes con microftalmos o cavidades anoftálmicas adquiridas suele requerir cirugías reconstructivas agresivas. En los últimos años se han publicado trabajos sobre el uso de rellenos para optimizar la simetría del tejido orbitario, como técnicas mínimamente invasivas.Por este motivo, hemos realizado una revisión sistemática de la literatura publicada hasta el momento sobre la administración orbitaria de rellenos para el tratamiento de la pérdida de volumen. Se identificaron 14 artículos que cumplían con los criterios de selección; en los que se analizó el material utilizado, la técnica de inyección, el estudio anatómico de los pacientes antes del procedimiento y la presencia de complicaciones asociadas. Los materiales utilizados como relleno son: la grasa autóloga, la hidroxiapatita cálcica, el colágeno, el ácido hialurónico o el gel de poliacrilamida. Se aplicaron técnicas estándar de inyección peribulbar y retrobulbar, con escasas complicaciones asociadas, siendo la má grave el desarrollo de cuadros vaso-vagales. El seguimiento de los pacientes suele limitarse en la mayoría de los estudios a 12 meses, con variaciones significativas en la exoftalmometría posprocedimiento. En conclusión, la utilización de rellenos parece una práctica segura y con buenos resultados, aunque se precisan estudios con tiempo de seguimiento más prolongado que los publicados hasta el momento. (AU)

The treatment of facial asymmetry in patients with microphthalmos or acquired anophthalmic cavities usually requires aggressive reconstructive surgeries. In recent years, studies have been published on the use of fillers to optimize orbital tissue symmetry, as minimally invasive techniques.For this reason, we performed a systematic review of the literature published to date on the use of fillers for the treatment of volume loss in acquired anophthalmic or microphthalmic cavities. Fourteen articles were reviewed in which the material used, the injection technique, the anatomical study of the patients before the procedure and the presence of associated complications were analyzed.Various materials have been used as fillers, including autologous fat, calcium hydroxyapatite, collagen, hyaluronic acid, or polyacrylamide gel. Standard peribulbar and retrobulbar injection techniques were applied, with few associated complications, the most serious being the development of vasovagal symptoms. Patient follow-up is usually limited in most studies to 12 months.In Conclusion, the use of fillers seems to be a safe practice, with good results and few complications, although studies with longer follow-up times than those published to date would be required. (AU)

Orbital administration of fillers for optimization of symmetry in patients with microphthalmos or acquired anophthalmic sockets: A review.

The treatment of facial asymmetry in patients with microphthalmos or acquired anophthalmic sockets usually requires aggressive reconstructive surgeries. In recent years, studies have been published on the use of fillers to optimize orbital tissue symmetry, as minimally invasive techniques. For this reason, we performed a systematic review of the literature published to date on the use of fillers for the treatment of volume loss in acquired anophthalmic or microphthalmic cavities. Fourteen articles were reviewed in which the material used, the injection technique, the anatomical study of the patients before the procedure and the presence of associated complications were analyzed. Various materials have been used as fillers, including autologous fat, calcium hydroxyapatite, collagen, hyaluronic acid, or polyacrylamide gel. Standard peribulbar and retrobulbar injection techniques were applied, with few associated complications, the most serious being the development of vasovagal symptoms. Patient follow-up is usually limited in most studies to 12 months. In Conclusion, the use of fillers seems to be a safe practice, with good results and few complications, although studies with longer follow-up times than those published to date would be required.

Painful-blind eye: A forgotten palliative care.

Painful-blind eye (PBE) is a challenging and debilitating condition that greatly affects the quality of life of patients. Although PBE can result from a variety of etiologies, currently there is no guideline or consensus on how to approach therapeutically these patients, and most treatments are experience-based. We summarized the evidence from available studies to investigate the current state of PBE treatment strategies. This review revealed that the information available about therapeutic approaches in patients with PBE is insufficient and outdated, therefore, new experimental and larger studies are needed to reach an agreement about this condition.

Material risk: vitreoretinal surgery, evisceration, enucleation and sympathetic ophthalmia-where are we currently?

Sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) is known to occur after severe penetrating eye injury, evisceration and even enucleation surgery. Recent evidence suggests that a greater risk lies after multiple vitreoretinal procedures. The risk of SO following evisceration is only minimally greater than that following enucleation surgery. This review evaluates literature on SO to date and provides figures for the risk of developing SO for the purposes of the consent process. The issue of SO and Material Risk following vitreoretinal surgery is reviewed and figures for the purposes of consent are outlined. This is of particular relevance for patients in whom the contralateral eye is and will likely remain the better seeing eye. Sympathetic ophthalmitis is known to occur after severe penetrating eye injury, after evisceration and enucleation. More recently, sympathetic ophthalmitis has been recognised to occur after vitreoretinal surgery. This article reviews the evidence on material risk when consenting patients for elective and emergency eye procedures after ocular trauma or surgery. When a globe needs to be removed because of irreparable ocular injury, previous publications dictated the procedure to be an enucleation because of the fear of an increased risk of SO after an evisceration. Perhaps the issue of material risk of sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) remains over-emphasised by ophthalmic plastic surgeons and under-recognised by vitreoretinal surgeons during the consent process for evisceration, enucleation and vitreoretinal surgery. Antecedent trauma and number of previous surgeries may actually be a more significant risk factor than the type of eye removal. Recent medicolegal cases also help us understand the importance of the discussion of this risk. We present our current understanding of the risk of SO after different procedures and suggest how this information may be included in a patient consent.

Novel use of an autologous scleral button graft to close the anterior defect in evisceration surgery.

PURPOSE: To present an alternative evisceration technique with long-term follow-up data. This technique involves the insertion of an acrylic implant into a modified scleral shell which is closed using an autologous scleral graft. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of eviscerations performed in a district-general hospital in the UK. All patients underwent conventional ocular evisceration after total keratectomy. A full thickness scleral graft is harvested from the posterior sclera, using an internal approach, with an 8 mm dermatological punch. An 18-20 mm acrylic implant is placed into the shell, and the scleral graft is used to close the anterior defect. Demographic characteristics, implant size and type, and cosmetic results from pictures of all patients were recorded. All patients were invited for a review to measure motility, eyelid height, patient recorded satisfaction and complications. RESULTS: Of the five patients identified, one had since died. The remaining four attended a review in person. The mean time between surgery and review was 48 months. The mean implant size was 19 mm. There were no cases of implant extrusion or infection. All four had a <1 mm asymmetry in measured eyelid height and ≥5 mm horizontal gaze motility. All patients self-reported "good" cosmesis. An independent assessment identified "mild asymmetry" in two cases and "moderate" in the other two. CONCLUSION: Evisceration with this novel autologous scleral graft technique restores volume in the anterior orbit with good cosmetic results, and with no cases of implant exposure reported in this small case series. This technique should be compared prospectively to established techniques.

[Evisceration, enucleation and exenteration-Indications, techniques, and postoperative care]. / Eviszeration, Enukleation, Exenteration ­ Indikationen, Techniken und postoperative Nachsorge.

Various surgical techniques are available for the extirpation of an eye, depending on the underlying disease. Typical indications encompass tumors, inflammatory and infectious processes, glaucoma, trauma as well as congenital malformations. Surgical procedures include evisceration (resection of the intraocular space with preservation of the sclera), enucleation (extirpation of the entire eyeball including sclera and cornea) and exenteration (resection of the complete orbital soft tissue). The early detection of postoperatively manifesting complications, such as implant extrusion, conjunctivitis, postenucleation socket syndrome as well as the development of enophthalmus or ptosis, is of particular relevance in the context of postoperative care regarding functional, esthetic and social outcome. Special attention must be paid to ensuring a complication-free rehabilitation process, including the supply of a suitable, precisely fitting prosthesis or epithesis. This ensures the patient's psychosocial reintegration, in which an integrated interdisciplinary cooperation with ocularists and psychologists is essential. The latter play a particularly important role, as the psychological stress resulting from the procedure is often associated with a considerable reduction in the quality of life.

Outcome of eviscerations and enucleations at a Swedish tertiary referral centre between 2008 and 2019: improved surgical management leading to reduced complication rate.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the results of all eviscerations and enucleations performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, during 2008-2019 and to compare them with previously collected data from 1999 to 2007. METHODS: This was a retrospective investigation using the medical records for all patients having had an evisceration or an enucleation at the Department of Ophthalmology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, during the two defined periods of time. Main outcome measure was postoperative complications. RESULTS: During 1999-2007, 181 surgeries were performed, 100 with implants, and 28/100 exposed implants and 9/100 removed implants were recorded during follow-up. During 2008-2019, 250 operations were performed with 158 implants, and there were 3/158 exposed implants and 2/158 extruded implants. Two ruptures of the surgical wound without implant exposure were noted, and one implant was exchanged. The reduction of exposed implants between the two periods was statistically significant (p < .001, Chi-square test). In enucleations, the use of one kind of porous polyethylene implant in the recent study period replaced a multitude of implants in the earlier study period. In eviscerations, the major change between the two study periods was the introduction of the split sclera technique and smaller implant size. CONCLUSION: The change in surgical technique between the two periods led to a significant reduction in implant-related complications.

Clinical and histopathological study of a hollow and posteriorly multiperforated polymethylmethacrylate implant in eviscerated rabbit eyes.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate the clinical and tissue response to a hollow polymethylmethacrylate orbital implant with a multiperforated posterior surface in an animal model after evisceration. METHODS: Sixteen New Zealand rabbits had their right eye eviscerated. All animals received a hollow polymethylmethacrylate implant 12 mm in diameter that is multiperforated in its posterior hemisphere. The animals were divided into four groups, and each one had the eye exenterated at 7, 30, 90, and 180 days post-evisceration. Clinical signs were assessed daily for 14 days post-evisceration and then every 7 days until 180 days. Inflammatory pattern, collagen structure, and degree of neovascularization generated with implant placement were analyzed with hematoxylin-eosin, picrosirius red, and immunohistochemistry staining. RESULTS: There were no signs of infection, conjunctival or scleral thinning, or implant exposure or extrusion in any animal during the study. On day 7, the new tissue migrated into the implant and formed a fibrovascular network through the posterior channels. Inflammatory response reduced over time, and no multinuclea-ted giant cells were found at any time. CONCLUSION: Hollow polymethylmethacrylate orbital implants with a multiperforated posterior surface enable rapid integration with orbital tissues by fibrovascular ingrowth. We believe that this orbital implant model can be used in research on humans.

Risk factors for enucleation or evisceration in endophthalmitis.

PURPOSE: To identify clinical risk factors for enucleation or evisceration in patients with endophthalmitis at an academic institution. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with endophthalmitis at Wilmer Eye Institute from 2010 to 2019 was conducted. Clinical characteristics, including demographics, cause for endophthalmitis, microbial culture results, salvaging procedures and surgical intervention were recorded. In patients who underwent enucleation or evisceration, type of surgery and placement of a primary implant were recorded. Chi-squared, Student's t-tests and multivariate analysis were used to identify clinical factors that predicted enucleation or evisceration. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty three patients treated for endophthalmitis over the study period were identified, of which 25 (9.88%) underwent enucleation or evisceration. Risk factors for enucleation or evisceration included poor presenting visual acuity (OR 7.86, CI: 2.26, 27.3), high presenting intraocular pressure (OR 1.07, CI: 1.03, 1.12), presence of relative afferent pupillary defect (OR 3.69, CI: 1.20, 11.37) and positive vitreous culture for methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (OR 18.3, CI: 1.54, 219.2) on multivariate analysis. Patients undergoing enucleation or evisceration were also more likely to have trauma, corneal ulcer or combined causes for endophthalmitis and underwent fewer salvaging surgical and procedural interventions. There were no significant differences in characteristics of those receiving enucleation versus evisceration in our cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients with endophthalmitis who underwent enucleation or evisceration had more severe disease on presentation compared to those treated with eye sparing therapy. Presenting clinical characteristics may have a role in triage and management decisions for patients presenting with severe endophthalmitis.

Demography, Clinical Settings and Outcomes in Evisceration with Implant: An Electronic Medical Records Driven Analytics of 2071 Cases.

PURPOSE: To describe the demography, clinical settings and outcomes in 2071 patients undergoing evisceration across a multi-tier ophthalmology hospital network and comparison of results with the global scenario of clinical settings for evisceration. METHODS: An analysis of 2071 patients undergoing evisceration and implant between 2013 and 2019. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was 39 ± 22 years. Children constituted 303(15%) of the cases. The four leading indications for surgery included painful blind eye in 760(37%), phthisis bulbi in 552(27%), staphyloma in 215(10%) and open globe injury in 195(9%) patients. The clinical settings encountered were trauma in 852(41%), ocular infection in 714(34%), glaucoma in 198(10%), post ocular surgery in 146(7%), congenital in 95(5%) and uveitis in 21(1%). Trauma and infection remained the commonest clinical settings in the urban (843,75%), rural (622,77%) and metropolitan (101,71%) areas. Decade wise distribution suggested trauma to be the commonest clinical setting in the first 4 decades and infection in the next 6 decades. The mean follow-up period was 351 ± 386 days (median 194). While trauma remained one of the commonest clinical setting in both the developed and the developing economies, painful blind eye and intractable glaucoma were other common clinical settings in the developed economies and infection was one of the leading clinical setting in the developing economies. CONCLUSION: Most patients undergoing evisceration are young. The commonest indications for surgery include painful blind eye and phthisis bulbi. Trauma and infection remain the commonest clinical settings for evisceration in developed and developing economies.

Surgical outcomes of orbital evisceration with primary orbital implant placement in patients with endophthalmitis.

OBJECTIVES: This study reports the surgical outcomes of evisceration with primary orbital implant placement in patients with endophthalmitis and analyses the association with implant exposure and extrusion. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre, Chinese cohort study. Review of medical records and orbital images of patients who underwent evisceration with primary orbital implant placement between January 2005 and January 2021. RESULTS: Out of 79 patients who underwent orbital evisceration with primary orbital implant placement, 26 (26 eyes) of them (male = 13) suffered from endophthalmitis. The duration from endophthalmitis diagnosis (19 = exogenous, 7 = endogenous) to evisceration was 9 standard deviation ± 5 (range: 1-15) days. The follow-up was 70 ± 46 (24-180) months after operation. The orbital implant size was 17 ± 3 (14-20) mm, and silicone was the most used material (69%, 18/26 of patients). The most frequent post-operative complication was orbital implant exposure (42%, 11/26), followed by orbital implant extrusion (12% 3/26) and ptosis (8%, 2/26). Implant exposure or extrusion was more commonly associated with endophthalmitis in comparison to non-endophthalmitis patients that required evisceration and primary orbital implant placement (54% versus 17%, P < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed single scleral closure technique (100% versus 58%, P < 0.05) and endogenous endophthalmitis (50% versus 0%, P < 0.05) were associated with implant exposure or extrusion, and only endogenous endophthalmitis was significant with multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Primary implant placement during evisceration should be avoided in eyes with endophthalmitis especially in those with an endogenous source, and double scleral closure technique may be a better alternative for primary orbital implant placement in infected eyes.

Single or double? A comparison of evisceration techniques.

PURPOSE: We compared the rates of implant exposure and extrusion after evisceration with single and double scleral closure techniques. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who underwent evisceration with an implant insertion over the past 18 years at Tung Wah Eastern Hospital and Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital. Clinical documents and operation records were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 81 ethnic Chinese patients (44 male) who underwent evisceration with primary implant insertion were reviewed. 39 (48%) patients underwent the double scleral closure technique with an implant placed posterior to the posterior sclera, and 42 (52%) patients underwent the single scleral closure technique with an implant inserted in the intra-scleral cavity. The follow-up interval was 70 months. The surgical indications were endophthalmitis (35%), painful blind eye (23%), traumatic disfigured globe (22%) and phthisis bulbi (20%). Silicone was the most used implant material (69%). The patients who underwent double scleral closure had a larger size of the implant (19.7 vs 17.9 mm, p < 0.05). Both implant exposure (26% vs 3%, p < 0.05) and implant extrusion (26% vs 0%, p < 0.05) were more common in patients who underwent single scleral. CONCLUSIONS: Double scleral closure technique allows a larger implant, and it is associated with a lower rate of implant exposure and extrusion. The double scleral closure technique is a superior technique of choice in these patients with primary implant placement.

Trends in Eye Removal Surgeries at a Tertiary Care Hospital Over Three Decades.

PURPOSE: To determine the trends in eye removal surgeries at a tertiary hospital in Nigeria over 26 years. METHODS: A retrospective comparative review of clinical records of all patients who had eye removal surgery at a tertiary hospital in Ile-Ife, Nigeria, between 2014 and 2019 was done. Patients' demographic and clinical data, including indication for eye removal and type of surgery were analysed and compared with two earlier studies at the same hospital between 1994 and 2013. RESULTS: There was an average of 14.3 surgeries per year between 2014 and 2019. Patients' ages ranged from 2 to 102 years, M:F was 1.5:1, the commonest indication for eye removal was infection (n=30, 34.9%), and the most common surgery was evisceration (n=70, 81.4%). Studies from 1994 to 2003 and 2005 to 2013, reported an average of 9.2 and 10 surgeries per year; ages ranging from 4 days to 88 years and 3 months to 88 years; with a M:F of 2.1:1 and 3.4:1 respectively. In both studies, the commonest indication for eye removal was trauma (43.4% and 43.8% respectively) and the most common surgery was enucleation (57.6% and 55% respectively). Trend data showed a progressive increase in eye infections (12% vs 15% vs 34.9%) and eviscerations (19.6% vs 31.2% vs 81.4%) over time. CONCLUSION: There was a change in trend towards an increase in eviscerations and infective indications for eye removal at the hospital over three decades. Prompt and optimal treatment of orbito-ocular infections is recommended to reduce the incidence of eye removal surgeries.

BUT: Déterminer les tendances des chirurgies d'ablation de l'oeil dans un hôpital tertiaire du Nigeria sur une période de 26 ans. MÉTHODES: Un examen comparatif rétrospectif des dossiers cliniques de tous les patients ayant subi une chirurgie d'ablation de l'œil dans un hôpital tertiaire d'Ile-Ife, au Nigeria, entre 2014 et 2019, a été effectué. Les données démographiques et cliniques des patients, y compris l'indication de l'ablation de l'œil et le type de chirurgie, ont été analysées et comparées à deux études antérieures menées dans le même hôpital entre 1994 et 2013. RÉSULTATS: Il y avait une moyenne de 14,3 chirurgies par an entre 2014 et 2019. L'âge des patients allait de 2 à 102 ans, le rapport M:F était de 1,5:1, l'indication la plus courante pour l'ablation de l'œil était l'infection (n=30, 34,9%), et la chirurgie la plus fréquente était l'éviscération (n=70, 81,4%). Les études menées de 1994 à 2003 et de 2005 à 2013 ont fait état d'une moyenne de 9,2 et 10 interventions chirurgicales par an, d'âges allant de 4 jours à 88 ans et de 3 mois à 88 ans, et d'un rapport M:F de 2,1:1 et 3,4:1 respectivement. Dans les deux études, l'indication la plus courante pour l'ablation de l'œil était le traumatisme (43,4 % et 43,8 % respectivement) et la chirurgie la plus courante était l'énucléation (57,6 % et 55 % respectivement). Les données sur les tendances ont montré une augmentation progressive des infections oculaires (12 % vs 15 % vs 34,9 %) et des éviscérations (19,6 % vs 31,2 % vs 81,4 %) au fil du temps. CONCLUSION: On constate un changement de tendance vers une augmentation des éviscérations et des indications infectieuses pour l'ablation des yeux à l'hôpital sur trois décennies. Un traitement rapide et optimal des infections orbitooculaires est recommandé pour réduire l'incidence des chirurgies d'ablation des yeux. Mots clés: Anesthésie, énucléation, éviscération, exentération, implant orbitaire, tendances.

Enucleations, Eviscerations, and Exenterations at a Supratertiary-care Hospital in Puerto Rico: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a descriptive analysis of the indications and the intraoperative and postoperative complications of eye enucleations and eviscerations, and orbital exenterations performed at the only academic institution in Puerto Rico providing supratertiary care. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review of patients who underwent enucleations, eviscerations, and exenterations from January 2015 through June 2020 was conducted. The data were analyzed to generate a descriptive profile of the demographic characteristics of the patients, their clinical indications and surgical complications, and a histopathological diagnosis per type of eye-removal procedure. RESULTS: A total of 118 eyes were removed via enucleation, evisceration, or exenteration over the 66-month study period. The average patient age was 64 (±17.5) years and 63.8% of the patients were male. The most frequently performed eye-removal procedure was enucleation (73.7%), followed by evisceration (18.6%) and exenteration (7.6%). The main clinical indications for enucleations and eviscerations were infectious processes, namely panophthalmitis, endophthalmitis, and/or perforated corneal ulcers, that failed medical management. In our sample, squamous cell carcinoma was the most common diagnosis (both clinically and histopathologically) leading to exenteration. Postoperative complications in our patient cohort were minimal. CONCLUSION: At our institution, enucleations predominate over eviscerations. Retrospective reviews published in recent years indicate that the rate of eviscerations at our institution is comparatively low. The results of this study, the first of its kind at our institution, may encourage a re-evaluation of the indications for evisceration versus enucleation in our patient population.

Outcomes of evisceration or enucleation by resident trainees in patients with recalcitrant endophthalmitis or panophthalmitis.

To evaluate the surgical outcomes and complications of evisceration or enucleation with primary implantation, performed by ophthalmology resident trainees, in regards to patients with recalcitrant endophthalmitis or panophthalmitis. We also compared the surgical outcomes and complications between resident trainees and experienced staff. In this retrospective analysis, the clinical records of all patients diagnosed with endophthalmitis or panophthalmitis who underwent enucleation or evisceration with primary implantation over a 13-year period were reviewed. The factors predicting implant exposure or extrusion in regards to patients who underwent eye removal by trainees were identified using multivariate analysis. The percentages of successful prosthesis fittings and complications were also reported. Sixty-six patient records, median age of 46.8 years, who underwent eye removal by resident trainees were reviewed. Thirty-six (55%) out of 66 patients were diagnosed with panophthalmitis. Four patients (6%) had implant exposure, and 4 patients (6%) had implant extrusion. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection (P = .02, adjusted odd ratio [aOR] = 33.75) and not receiving intravitreal antimicrobial drugs before the eye removal procedure (P = .02, aOR = 30.11) were associated with implant exposure or extrusion. Patients with panophthalmitis who underwent evisceration had a higher rate of implant exposure or extrusion than those who underwent enucleation (P = .03, aOR 38.38). At the last visit, 65 patients had a successful prosthesis fitting. Furthermore, there were similar rates of complications and successful prosthesis fittings between experienced staff and resident trainees. This study suggests that evisceration or enucleation with primary implant placement in patients with recalcitrant endophthalmitis or panophthalmitis can be performed by resident trainees with acceptable surgical outcomes and a low rate of serious complications.

Silicone Sphere Implant Extrusion From Orbital Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis: A Rare Complication in the Anophthalmic Socket.

Orbital implant extrusion is a known complication following evisceration and enucleation. In this case report, we present a 45-year-old woman who presented with a left silicone implant exposure and infection 2 years following evisceration with saddle nose on examination. CT of the maxillofacial bones without contrast showed bilateral soft tissue infiltration around the superior recti muscles, as well as a nasal septum perforation from extensive sinus disease. Left orbitotomy revealed a small fibrotic mass near the orbital roof. Biopsy and serology results were consistent with granulomatosis with polyangiitis.

Evisceration and enucleation cases in the ophthalmologic emergency department of a tertiary Brazilian hospital.

PURPOSE: To analyze the epidemiological profiles of evisceration and enucleation cases in the ophthalmologic emergency department of a Brazilian tertiary hospital. METHODS: Patients treated in the ophthalmologic emergency department of Hospital São Paulo (Universidade Federal de São Paulo) during the period 2013 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Urgent cases of evisceration or enucleation surgery were included, and elective cases were excluded. The following information was extracted from the patients' medical records: demographic data, immediate and associated reasons for the surgical procedure, informed visual acuity, symptom duration until ophthalmologic care, complications, distance from the residence to the tertiary hospital, and time of hospitalization. RESULTS: In total, 61 enucleations and 121 eviscerations were included in this study. The patients had a mean age of 63.27 ± 18.68 years. Of the patients, 99 were male (54.40%), and 83 were female (45.60%). The indications for evisceration or enucleation were corneal perforation with (44.50%) and without (23.63%) signs of infection, endophthalmitis (15.38%), ocular trauma (14.29%), neoplasia (0.55%), burn accident (1.10%), and phthisis bulbi (0.55%). The self-reported visual acuity was no light perception (87.36%) or light perception (1.10%). However, 3.30% of the patients did not cooperate with the examination, and no information on visual acuity was available for the remaining 8.24%. The mean symptom duration before ophthalmologic care was sought was 18.32 days. Two patients had sympathetic ophthalmia after evisceration. CONCLUSIONS: More eviscerations than enucleations were performed throughout the study period. The most common demographic characteristics were age >60 years and male sex. The main indications for urgent evisceration and enucleation procedures were corneal perforation with and without infection, endophthalmitis, and ocular trauma. The findings from this study could guide clinicians in performing preventive measures to avoid destructive eye procedures.

Outcomes and complications of evisceration with primary implant: an electronic medical record driven analytics of 1800 cases.

PURPOSE: To describe the surgical outcomes and implant complications in 1,800 patients undergoing evisceration with primary implant. METHODS: An Electronic Medical Record-driven analysis of 1,800 patients undergoing evisceration with primary implant between 2013 and 2019. Implant sizing was performed intra-operatively to place the largest implant without tension on the wound closure. Outcome measures included implant complications, prosthesis measurements, and incidence of a good aesthetic outcome. Good outcome was defined as <2 mm enophthalmos and grade 1 or less superior sulcus deformity with a custom ocular prosthesis. RESULTS: Eighteen hundred eyes of 1800 patients were included. The mean age at surgery was 36 ± 21 years (median 32 years). Implants used were poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) in 1737 (97%) and porous polyethylene in 63 (3%) patients. Two-petal sclerotomy was performed in 1512 (88%) and four-petal sclerotomy in 165 (10%) patients. The mean diameter of the implant used was 19.35 ± 1.18 mm (median 20, range 10-22 mm). The implant extrusion rate was 3% (56) and implant displacement was seen in none. The mean prosthesis volume and thickness were 2.22 ± 0.67 ml (median 2, range 1-6.5 ml) and 6 ± 1 mm (median 6, range 2-9 mm). The mean difference in prosthesis projection on Hertel's exophthalmometer was 0.28 ± 1 mm (median 0, range 0-1 mm). Good outcome was observed in 93%. The mean follow-up period was 351 ± 386 days (median 194). CONCLUSION: Evisceration with empirically selected primary orbital implant placement is associated with minimal implant complications and gives a good aesthetic outcome in 93% of the patients.

Allogenic dehydrated human pericardium patch graft (Tutoplast): A novel use for reconstruction in orbital implant exposure.

PURPOSE: Exposure of orbital implant post enucleation or evisceration remains one of the common complications irrespective of the type of implant used. Dermis fat graft and temporalis fascia have been used to repair the implant exposure in anophthalmic sockets. Tutoplast® pericardium, gamma sterilised dehydrated human pericardium, has been used as a scleral patch graft for glaucoma drainage device exposure and scleral thinning post squint surgery. We report the novel use of Tutoplast® patch graft to repair orbital implant exposure in this case series. METHODS: The case notes of three patients who received Tutoplast® pericardium patch graft to repair implant exposure were reviewed. Data regarding presenting symptoms, implant type, time to exposure from primary surgery, post-operative complications and length of follow up post Tutoplast® pericardium patch graft were collected. RESULTS: Three patients presented with implant exposure following evisceration. The presenting symptoms were recurrent infection, discharging socket and discomfort in all three patients. One patient had a Medpore implant, two had silicone implants. Total follow-up ranged from 9 to 22 months. In all three cases, there was relief from symptoms and the graft had incorporated fully into the surrounding orbital tissue with no recurrent exposure noted during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Tutoplast® pericardium has demonstrated a good safety profile and is a suitable material to use as a patch graft for orbital implant exposure.